As an interpreter of nature... Leibnitz stands in no comparison with Newton. His general views in physics were vague and unsatisfactory; he had no great value for inductive reasoning; it was not the way of arriving at truth which he was accustomed to take; and hence, to the greatest physical discovery of that age, and that which was established by the most ample induction, the existence of gravity as a fact in which all bodies agree, he was always incredulous, because no proof of it, a priori could be given.
0
⚖0
▼Source
source
John Playfair, [https://books.google.com/books?id=2ekgAQAAMAAJ Dissertations on the History of Metaphysical and Ethical: And of Mathematical and Physical Science], Vol. 1. Dissertation Third, p. 572.