The Greeks follow a wrong usage in speaking of coming into being and passing away; for nothing comes into being or passes away, but there is mingling and separation of things that are. So they would be right to call coming into being mixture, and passing away separation.
0
⚖0
▼Source
source
Frag. B 17, quoted in John Burnet's Early Greek Philosophy, (1920), Chapter 6.
Thought is something limitless and independent, and has been mixed with no thing but is alone by itself. ... What was mingled with it would have prevented it from having power over anything in the way in which it does. ... For it is the finest of all things and the purest.
0
⚖0
▼Source
source
Frag. B12, in Jonathan Barnes, Early Greek Philosophy (1984), p. 190.
And since these things are so, we must suppose that there are contained many things and of all sorts in the things that are uniting, seeds of all things, with all sorts of shapes and colours and savours.
0
⚖0
▼Source
source
Frag. B 4, quoted in John Burnet's Early Greek Philosophy, (1920), Chapter 6.
Wrongly do the Greeks suppose that aught begins or ceases to be; for nothing comes into being or is destroyed; but all is an aggregation or secretion of pre-existent things: so that all-becoming might more correctly be called becoming-mixed, and all corruption, becoming-separate.
0
⚖0
▼Source
source
quoted in Heinrich Ritter, Tr. from German by Alexander James William Morrison, The History of Ancient Philosophy, Vol.1