I'd think that is impossible because it ceases to be truth about something at some point and just becomes the thing.

The description of what “God” is, and “God” itself are the same thing. But that’s not how we create truth. Truth uses symbols or language to apply to a visible object or system. Then we can grade truth value by matching how well the symbols captured what we see. I’m proposing that “God” is both the language and the subject and just declares itself true with no standard. It simply can’t be truth, and since anybody can alter it, it’s also meaningless and worthless as a thing “God”. Fight me 😂

There's not enough evidence to say what "God" is, so of course I can't say there isn't one. THERE ISN'T EVEN ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO BE AGNOSTIC.

#philosophy #quotes #CivilSimian #UniversalHumanism

So...no participation trophies?

He's likely talking about "God"...meh....